Next, you'll be asked to connect with Twitter. Rest assured, we will never send a tweet from your account without your permission.
We will send you an email with an invite soon.
When big data comes to journalism it will require more than fancy charts. @emilybell has thought a lot of this through:
What was once called "newspaper journalism" doesn't need to be re-invented so much as unleashed. Let @froomkin explain:
In the week of Facebook's IPO, @carr2n goes with a profile of The Atavist, a journalism start-up you should know about.
@David_Dobbs Agreed. But I would put it differently. Blogging showed mainstream journalism how conditions for all of us had changed.
@adadithya OK. But that's not what Anderson told the speaker. He said even if the talk was a home run TED wouldn't release it. Too partisan.
@adadithya "Embarrassment for TED" is, in my view, justified. In your view, not. You understand my reasoning, you just don't agree with it.
@adadithya The fuss was about TED's reasoning: that this was partisan talk, and it must remain rigorously non-partisan in an election year.
Ah, thanks @kbondelli. TED head Chris Anderson did post a response today: I won't characterize it. Just read it.
Such an embarrassment for TED. And what have we heard from that organization today? Zero, from what I can tell.
I love this story. Not in the sense that I love that it happened. I do not. But it's just so... interesting. Ya know?
Why does the AP bother? It's just going to squirt "he said, she said" goo all over the story. I don't get it. Do you?
If you get fooled and you run a bogus story, you RETRACT it, right? It's not an update. It's a "we screwed up!" Well...
Don't want to get "too political?" Then go shopping. Play golf. Make love. Just don't tell us you're in the business of ideas, TED... Jeez.
"Ideas worth spreading..." UNLESS they partake of the political divide in this country. Then: not worth spreading. TED: you're embarrassing.
Got ideas on what the news system *should* become? Set aside some time and study this talk by Google's @RichardGingras.
Ever wonder if those fact-checking segments that the press does come out 50-50 for the two parties? Well...
Politico says both Romney and Obama can't stand the campaign press: I found it deeply self-serving. See what you think.
Why that $2 billion loss for JPMorgan that you've been hearing about was a "win for the business press."
It's fun playing Meet the Press trivia with you, @BetsyMTP Will you also address Brokaw's comments on the WHCA dinner?
For the weekday crew: On Meet the Press, Tom Brokaw blasts the White House Correspondents dinner Video at my Tumblr.
Cool! Roger Ailes gave a lecture on how there's no ideology at Fox News but there is at the New York Times and the AP.
I agree entirely with Erik Wemple's assessment in this column: New York Times public editor to leave in September.
About 90 percent of the obituaries that make the New York Times front page are anticipated and thus written in advance.
A report on this week's future-of-news panel with Jarvis, Rosen, Dean Starkman, Josh Benton... in Capital New York.
@JonahNRO Yes, it's profitable anyway. But that would be a reason to gamble on interesting shows in prime time, instead of brain dead shows.
No one can teach CNN a thing. Not even the ratings. Its response will be to keep the brain-dead shows and switch hosts.
Uh... CNN? Brain dead formats with new hosts are still brain dead formats. So the shows fail and you change the hosts.
As I said, a brain dead format with Erin Burnett hosting is still a brain dead format, just dumber. And a ratings flop:
@Manoushz @katiecouric @yahoonews I'd have to watch it carefully to know. Haven't. But I have done that with UpFront and it is brain dead.
@macvie @Ombudsman I don't understand the grant; and to the extent that I do understand it I do not agree with the logic of the grant.
It's not a non-profit, @RoqPlanas. Once the grant runs out and the LA Times cannot afford to cover that stuff anymore, what's been achieved?
I don't understand this grant. Do you? Los Angeles Times receives $1-million from the Ford Foundation.
Cool! Roger Ailes gave a lecture on how there's no ideology at Fox News but there is at the New York Times and the AP.
I agree entirely with Erik Wemple's assessment in this column: New York Times public editor to leave in September.
About 90 percent of the obituaries that make the New York Times front page are anticipated and thus written in advance.
What was once called "newspaper journalism" doesn't need to be re-invented so much as unleashed. Let @froomkin explain:
It's hard to find intelligent writing about newspaper paywalls. But I have! @xarker on Charleston's news ecosystem.
@ryanchittum Maybe @emilybell can explain this one to us. The Daily Mail is the UK's Newspaper of the Year:
Top 25 U.S. newspapers ranked by combined print and digital circulation: (San Jose Mercury News is sixth, a surprise.)
